<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitgeek.com/nikon-d40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitgeek.com/nikon-d40/</link>
	<description>Hardware reviews and Tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Digital Rebel XTi</title>
		<link>http://www.digitgeek.com/nikon-d40/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Digital Rebel XTi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehardwarereviews.com/nikon-d40/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>[...] but cost a lot more as well. We&#8217;ve reviewed a couple SLR&#8217;s at Digit Geek like the Nikon D40 and the baby brother of todays review, the Canon Digital Rebel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but cost a lot more as well. We&#8217;ve reviewed a couple SLR&#8217;s at Digit Geek like the Nikon D40 and the baby brother of todays review, the Canon Digital Rebel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

